For web agencies across the EU

Every site you deliver is a compliance liability. Or a recurring invoice.

GDPR enforcement is no longer aimed only at large platforms. The violations that produced nine-figure fines in 2025 are technically identical to what runs on the small business sites your agency builds. You can be the one who finds them first.

GDPR enforcement across the EU

The regulator is no longer only chasing platforms.

Thirty supervisory authorities now enforce the same regulation across the EEA, and the pace has changed sharply: most of the money ever fined under the GDPR has been imposed in the last three years.

€7.1bn1
in GDPR fines issued across the EU since 2018
2,6852
documented enforcement cases as of March 2026
€1.2bn1
issued in 2025 alone
60%+1
of all fine value imposed since January 2023

In 2025 the French authority alone fined Google €325M and SHEIN €150M for cookies placed without valid consent.3 The Dutch authority fined Kruidvat €600,000 for pre-ticked boxes and issued formal warnings to more than 200 websites.4 Those two facts describe the same enforcement logic applied at two very different scales.

What the audit actually checks.

Most consent tools verify that a banner exists. Argus loads the site in a real browser, refuses consent as a user would, and records what still leaves for the network.

Consent Bypass Test

Argus clicks “Reject all”, then records every request that still leaves. This is the violation that cost Google €325M and SHEIN €150M in 2025, technically identical to what happens on ordinary client sites.

Server-side tracking

GTM Server-Side containers, Meta CAPI relays and CNAME-resolved subdomains that route data to third parties while appearing first-party to blockers.

Dark patterns in banners

Asymmetric buttons, extra clicks required to refuse, pre-ticked boxes. The Dutch DPA fined Kruidvat €600,000 for pre-ticked consent and warned over 200 websites.

Transfers outside the EEA

Session replay, analytics and advertising endpoints hosted outside the EEA, checked against the safeguards required by Chapter V of the GDPR.

Storage-based tracking

localStorage, sessionStorage and IndexedDB identifiers, which survive third-party cookie deprecation and are invisible to most consent tools.

Security headers

HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options and related headers, scored against OWASP recommendations and included in the same report.

Partner packs.

Billed annually, no hidden subscription. A single audit resold at your own rate covers a large share of the yearly cost.

Web agency

Agency Pack

1,990 € / year

Or €166 / month · 12-month term

€39.80 per audit

  • 50 audits per year
  • Co-branded reports
  • Dedicated partner portal
  • For teams of 3 to 20
Subscribe

Agency · most chosen

Agency Pro Pack

4,990 € / year

Or €416 / month · 12-month term

€33.27 per audit

  • 150 audits per year
  • Full white label, no ScanRGPD mention
  • Art. 28 GDPR timestamping
  • For agencies running at scale
Subscribe
Dalia Boutamdja, founder of ScanRGPD
Dalia Boutamdja · Founder
· Behind ScanRGPD · One person ·

I read every message myself.

No SDRs, no ticket queue, no outsourced support. ScanRGPD is built by one person, and that same person answers you, on GDPR strategy, on the Argus engine, on your specific case.

Contact me on LinkedIncontact@scanrgpd.fr
Personal reply within 1 business day

Sources

  1. DLA Piper GDPR fines and data breach survey, January 2026 (cumulative total, 2025 volume, post-2023 acceleration). Link
  2. CMS GDPR Enforcement Tracker, case count as of 1 March 2026. Link
  3. CNIL decisions of 2025 against Google (€325M) and SHEIN (€150M) for cookies placed without valid consent. Link
  4. Dutch DPA (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens) fine against Kruidvat for pre-ticked consent boxes. Link

Figures are reproduced as published by the cited sources. Totals differ between trackers because methodologies differ: some record only publicly disclosed decisions.